CR
Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 results were resilient but mixed: revenue was flat year over year at $37.7M while NOI declined to $20.8M and AFFO fell to $5.6M, driven by the August termination of the NYC lease at 250 Livingston, initial lease-up costs at Prospect House, and absence of the sold 10 West 65th Street property .
- Revenue slightly missed S&P Global consensus ($37.9M* vs. $37.7M actual); EPS consensus was not available, while analysts tracked FFO/share at $0.06* and the company reported AFFO/share of $0.13 (not directly comparable) .
- Residential fundamentals remained strong: new lease rates were ~14% above prior rents, renewals ~5–6% higher, occupancy ~99–100% across stabilized assets, and Prospect House moved from ~33% pre-leased in Q2 to ~60% in Q3 .
- Dividend was maintained at $0.095 per share; balance sheet liquidity stood at $26.1M unrestricted cash and $30.6M restricted cash; operating debt ~88% fixed at 3.87% with ~3.7-year average duration, and debt remains non-recourse and not cross-collateralized .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Strong residential demand: “new leases exceeded previous rents by nearly 14% and renewals by over 6%,” with stabilized properties ~99–100% leased; management emphasized “rents are generally at all-time highs” .
- Prospect House lease-up progressing: placed in service August 1; ~60% leased with gross pre-market rents >$88/sq ft; bridge financing completed last quarter to support stabilization .
- Disciplined capital and liability management: 88% fixed-rate operating debt at 3.87% avg rate, ~3.7-year duration; dividend maintained at $0.095 per share .
-
What Went Wrong
- Loss of commercial revenue: NYC vacated 250 Livingston on August 23, reducing commercial revenue by ~$1.9M in Q3 and pressuring NOI and AFFO .
- Initial lease-up drag: Prospect House contributed limited revenue but fully loaded expenses (interest, amortization, depreciation), reducing AFFO by ~$1.8M in Q3 .
- Higher operating costs and G&A: increased real estate taxes/insurance and G&A (non-cash stock-based compensation amortization) pressured results despite residential strength .
Financial Results
- Consolidated performance (YoY and sequential context in narrative below)
- Segment revenue breakdown
- KPIs
- Narrative analysis
- Revenue was flat YoY (+$0.1M) as residential revenue rose $1.9–$2.4M across ongoing properties, offset by ~$1.8–$1.9M headwind from 250 Livingston’s NYC lease termination and absence of 10 West 65th Street; sequential decline vs Q2 reflects the same drivers .
- NOI decreased ~$1.0M YoY on lower commercial revenue and lease-up costs; AFFO fell ~$2.2M YoY, with Prospect House lease-up and 250 Livingston termination together driving ~$3.7M reduction, partly offset by stronger ongoing residential NOI .
- EPS worsened to $(0.14) vs $(0.05) YoY and $(0.07) Q/Q on reduced commercial contribution and full lease-up expense load at Prospect House .
Notes: Asterisked values retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Management did not issue formal quantitative revenue/margin or tax guidance; commentary focused on Prospect House lease-up, resolving 250/141 Livingston, and maintaining operating discipline .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “new leases exceeded previous rents by nearly 14% and renewals by over 6%… Prospect House… is now in its initial lease up phase… At… 250 Livingston Street… our New York City tenant vacated… and we continue to actively seek solutions… [and] agreed to a five-year lease renewal with New York City [at] 141 Livingston Street” .
- COO: “residential leasing at all our stabilized properties is very strong… 99% leased overall… new rental rates… exceeded previous rents by over 14% and renewals by 5%… Prospect House… now 60% leased with pre-market units at $88 per sq ft gross” .
- CFO: “flat revenues of $37.7M versus $37.6M last year… NOI of $20.8M versus $21.8M… AFFO of $5.6M versus $7.8M… decrease driven by 250 Livingston termination and Prospect House lease-up…”; operating debt “88% fixed at… 3.87%… duration of 3.7 years… non-recourse… not cross-collateralized” .
Q&A Highlights
- Q3: No analyst questions; call concluded without Q&A, limiting external estimate/guidance clarification .
- Q1: One question on 141 Livingston renewal; management indicated no tenant improvements expected and aimed to finalize soon .
Estimates Context
- Revenue: Q3 consensus $37.9M* vs. actual $37.7M (miss ~0.5%); forward revenue estimates: Q4 2025 $36.2M*, Q1 2026 $37.0M* .
- EPS: Primary EPS consensus not available; company reported diluted EPS $(0.14) .
- FFO/share (REIT): Q3 consensus $0.06*; company reported AFFO/share $0.13 (different metric), so direct comparison is not appropriate .
Notes: Asterisked values retrieved from S&P Global.
Financial Results vs. Estimates
Notes: Asterisked values retrieved from S&P Global. FFO/share and AFFO/share are different measures.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Residential strength anchors the thesis: leasing spreads (+14% new, +5–6% renewals) and high occupancy underpin ongoing NOI resilience despite commercial headwinds .
- Near-term drag from Prospect House lease-up and 250 Livingston vacancy weighed on AFFO and EPS; expect improving contribution as Prospect House approaches stabilization .
- Balance sheet remains conservative with predominantly fixed-rate, non-recourse debt and adequate liquidity, supporting operational flexibility in resolving 250/141 Livingston .
- Dividend stability ($0.095) signals confidence in cash generation from the residential portfolio, even with transitional impacts .
- Estimate set is thin (limited analyst coverage): modest revenue miss vs consensus and lack of EPS estimates suggest potential for estimate revisions as lease-up and commercial solutions progress .
- Watch catalysts: Prospect House leasing pace, re-tenanting/solutions for 250 Livingston, lender consent for 141 Livingston renewal, and sustained rent/collection trends at Flatbush Gardens .
- Tactical view: Into Q4, residential momentum offsets commercial softness; stock narrative likely driven by evidence of lease-up conversion to cash flow and clarity on 250 Livingston path forward .